Table of contents
DECLARATION | i |
ABSTRACT | ii |
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS | iii |
TABLE OF CONTENTS | iv |
LIST OF FIGURES | vii |
Chapter 1: Introduction to the Research | 1 |
1.1: Statement of the Problem | 1 |
1.2: Purpose of the Study | 1 |
1.3: Null Hypothesis | 2 |
1.4: Definition of Terms | 2 |
1.5: Limitations of the Study | 6 |
Chapter 2: Literature Review | 9 |
2.1: Introduction | 9 |
2.2: Anatomy of Sensory Modulation Disorder | 9 |
2.3: The Effects of SMD on the Individual | 12 |
2.4: Specific Research into SMD | 15 |
2.5: The Treatment of SMD | 16 |
2.6: What is Substance Abuse? | 17 |
2.7: Risk factors and Precursors to Substance Abuse | 17 |
2.8: Physiology of Substance Abuse | 18 |
2.9: Traditional Treatment Approaches to Substance abuse | 22 |
2.10: Conclusion | 22 |
Chapter 3: Research Methodology | 23 |
3.1: Research Design | 23 |
3.2: Selection of Subjects | 23 |
3.3: Materials and Methods | 23 |
3.4: Control of Variables | 25 |
3.5: Collection of Data | 26 |
3.6: Data Analysis | 29 |
Chapter 4: Results | 31 |
4.1: Total Sample Results | 31 |
4.2:Results Related to Clients who Presented with Problems in any Area | 35 |
4.3: Results Specific to Vestibular Hypersensitivity | 37 |
4.4: Results Specific to Vestibular Hyposensitivity | 38 |
4.5: Results Specific to the Substance Abuse Problem | 39 |
4.6: Conclusion | 46 |
Chapter 5: Discussion | 47 |
5.1: Total Sample Discussion | 47 |
5.2: Discussion Related to clients who Presented with Problems in any Area | 48 |
5.3: Discussion specific to Vestibular Hypersensitivity | 49 |
5.4: Discussion Specific to Vestibular Hyposensitivity | 49 |
5.5: Discussion Related to the Substance Abuse Problem | 50 |
5.6: Conclusion | 51 |
Chapter 6: Conclusions | 52 |
6.1: Summary of the Research | 52 |
6.2: Recommendations | 52 |
References | 54 |
appendices 1-6 | 56 |
List of figures
figure | page |
1. Gender distribution for the total sample | 31 |
2. Percentages of current ages in the total sample | 32 |
3. Percentages of people in the total sample in each of the occupation sectors | 33 |
4. Marital status in the total sample | 34 |
5. Composition in percentages of the marital status in the vestibular hyposensitive sample with the remaining group | 35 |
6. Mother's age at delivery for the total sample | 36 |
7. Percentage of people in the total sample abusing the particular drug classes | 39 |
8. Percentage of people from the total sample in the allocated ages of onset (in years) of substance abuse | 40 |
9. Percentage of people in the total sample abusing substances for the allocated durations (in years) | 41 |
10. The composition in percentages of people in the total sample presenting with the three types of sensitivity and their substance of abuse | 42 |
11. Comparison between the percentage of people with vestibular hyper- and hyposensitivity, with respect to the specific drug classes | 43 |
12. Comparison of the vestibular hyposensitive people with the remaining group, with respect to the specific drug classes | 44 |
13. Comparison of the vestibular hypersensitive group with the remaining group, with respect to the specific drug classes | 45 |
14. Total sample analysis of the subjective reasons for abusing substances | 45 |